::fibreculture:: Release of "Australian Perspectives on Misinformation" report

Mathieu O'Neil mathieu.oneil at anu.edu.au
Wed Nov 11 07:48:25 CET 2020

Hi everyone

The News and Media Research Centre at the University of Canberra is proud to announce the release of its latest report, “Australian Perspectives on Misinformation,” by Mathieu O’Neil and Michael J. Jensen.

You can download the report here:


TOC and summary below FYI.





1. Divided they perceive: Australians and misinformation
    Mathieu O’Neil, N&MRC, UC
    Michael J. Jensen, IGPA / N&MRC, UC
    Jee Young Lee, N&MRC, UC

Commentary: A few words on misinformation and media
    Chris Zappone, The Age

2. Internet Research Agency campaigns in the Australian Twittersphere: Excerpts from Submission to the Senate Select Committee on foreign interference through social media
    Robert Ackland, Virtual Observatory for the Study of Online Networks / School of  Sociology, Australian National University
    Michael J. Jensen, N&MRC, UC
    Mathieu O’Neil, N&MRC, UC

Commentary: The social media infodemic and the “filter bubble” fallacy
    Axel Bruns, Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology

3. How misinformation affects an Australian journalist’s work
    Interview with Kelsie Iorio, ABC Digital by Mathieu O’Neil, N&MRC, UC

Commentary: Elite actors, misinformation and hashtag campaigns: #ArsonEmergency and #DanLiedPeopleDied
    Timothy Graham, Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology

4. Addressing conspiratorial beliefs: A critical history of misinformation
    Mathieu O’Neil, N&MRC, UC
    Michael J. Jensen, IGPA / N&MRC, UC



Concerns about the health of democracy and the public sphere are increasing due to the ease with which malign actors can spread misleading and manipulative claims. Misinformation, or misleading information spread unwittingly, is often distinguished from disinformation, which is misleading information spread with the intent to cause harm. Yet many successful disinformation campaigns contain true information, covertly disseminated to embarrass political targets: the quality of the information matters less than the nature of the operation it is part of. Although the content of messages need not be false to deceive, the ability to identify and protect true claims remains critically important.

Misinformation and disinformation and their effects are complex and interwoven with countless socio-political and psychological issues. The Australian Perspectives on Misinformation, the Critical Conversations Lab’s inaugural report, brings together several sources of data and a wide array of points of view, highlighting the Lab’s networked approach to the research process. The background of the report is the results from two existing N&MRC reports: Digital News Report: Australia 2020 and COVID-19: Australian News and Misinformation report, both of which tracked perceptions of misinformation in the Australian news consumers in 2020. The report next profiles two case studies: an analysis of campaigns by Russian Internet Research Agency “troll” accounts on in the Australian Twittersphere in the leadup to the 2016 Australian Federal election, and an interview with a young ABC Digital journalist about how misinformation affects her work practice. The final chapter replaces misinformation in a historical context and reviews psychological and networked communication approaches to countering it. The report also features expert comments by three leading Australian journalists and researchers. Finally, the report relays a set of practical messages to help teachers and politicians communicate about information literacy and outlines a series of hypothetical steps for how people might establish a fact-based common understanding with a conspiracy believer.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listcultures.org/pipermail/fibreculture_listcultures.org/attachments/20201111/e341f830/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Fibreculture mailing list