From studio at jonasstaal.nl Mon Mar 9 17:32:55 2020 From: studio at jonasstaal.nl (Studio Jonas Staal) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 16:32:55 +0000 Subject: Collectivize Facebook Message-ID: View this email in your browser Collectivize Facebook A Pre-Trial by Jonas Staal & Jan Fermon With contributions by Paul Goodwin, Inke Arns and Mar?a In?s Plaza Lazo HAU, Hebbel am Ufer, Berlin March 26, 2020, 8PM, HAU I R egistration Collectivize Facebook, Study (2020), Jonas Staal and Jan Fermon Image: Remco van Bladel and Jonas Staal With over two billion users today, Facebook impacts our social, economic and political lives in an unprecedented way. In response, artist Jonas Staal and lawyer Jan Fermon initiate a collective action lawsuit to force legal recognition of Facebook as a public domain that should be under ownership and control of its users. Turning the theater into a people?s tribunal, Staal and Fermon invite the public to join their juridical claim that Facebook must be collectivized. Facebook infringes upon the right to self-determination of peoples and individuals in various ways. The corporation instrumentalizes users as neo-feudal data workers, selling their information to third parties. Facebook is used in various surveillance capacities that infringe upon privacy and further impacts democratic elections in disproportionate ways, of which data capture and targeted campaigns of Cambridge Analytica are a recent example. And the corporation has willfully advised authoritarian regimes such as that of Duterte in the Philippines. During the Collectivize Facebook pre-trial, Staal and Fermon will introduce their indictment against Facebook, and invite the public present to become co-signatories to the lawsuit that will be submitted to the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva coming September 2020. Invited witnesses will additionally testify on the possibilities the lawsuit enables, and speculate on the complex questions of how to collectively govern Facebook as a global cooperative of 2.5 billion members in the future. Collectivize Facebook transforms the theater into a space of collective legal action and speculation. It invites the public to join a lawsuit, but also aims to enable the imagination when it comes to reclaiming and governing Facebook ? as well as other multinational corporations ? as our common public domains. From March 26 onwards, you can sign up to the collective action lawsuit via collectivize.org Jonas Staal is a visual artist, propaganda researcher and founder of the New World Summit Jan Fermon is a lawyer specialized in criminal, international (humanitarian) and human rights law Paul Goodwin is a curator, theorist and director of the Research Center for Transnational Art, Identity and Nation (TrAIN) Inke Arns is an author, curator and director of HMKV (Hartware MedienKunstVerein), Dortmund Mar?a In?s Plaza Lazo is a critic and founder of the newspaper Arts of the Working Class Collectivize Facebook project team: Jonas Staal (artist), Jan Fermon (lawyer), Nadine Gouders (coordinator Studio Jonas Staal), Paul Kuipers (architect), Remco van Bladel (visual identity), Ruben Hamelink (filmmaker), commissioned and produced by HAU, Hebbel am Ufer, Berlin, as part of the festival Spy on Me #2: Artistic Manoeuvres for the Digital Present Studio Jonas Staal studio at jonasstaal.nl jonasstaal.nl No longer want to receive these emails? Unsubscribe from this list . -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From xdxd.vs.xdxd at gmail.com Thu Mar 12 19:50:48 2020 From: xdxd.vs.xdxd at gmail.com (xDxD.vs.xDxD) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 19:50:48 +0100 Subject: point of view from a hospital for a brain surgery while cov19 Message-ID: Hi everyone again about cov19 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVrwsM5N3cs Things change, things stay the same: just like 7 years ago, I find myself in an hospital to have a brain surgery (all's fine this time, too) and just like 7 years ago it's super-important to reposition disease in our society, with all our strength and through all our capacity to be an example The Patient is never the only one diseased: it is the entire society, in solidarity among all. This is even more true in our hyperconnected world: in which we live and in which everything depends on everything else. This is the limit, tragedy, but also the great opportunty of our times: when data + computation are not a merely technical deal anymore, they assume an existential value for their characterstic of being our only credible way to experience complex, global, interconnected phenomena. This requires an enormous transformation: to our values, to our sense of solidarity, to how we perceive the ecosystem we live in. In one world: to our culture. Without an Ecosystemic Culture we will not make it: now it's cov19, then will be climate change and others, and things will be the same or worse. We need to start designing and building it together, now. Best wishes to you all salvatore iaconesi -- *Art is Open Source *- http://www.artisopensource.net *Human Ecosystems Relazioni* - https://www.he-r.it/ *Ubiquitous Commons *- http://www.ubiquitouscommons.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From douglas at publicsphereproject.org Tue Mar 24 20:56:12 2020 From: douglas at publicsphereproject.org (Doug Schuler) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 12:56:12 -0700 Subject: =?utf-8?q?Call_for_contributions_to_=28virtual=29_PD?= =?utf-8?q?C_workshop=3A_=E2=80=9CComputing_Professionals_for_Socia?= =?utf-8?q?l_Responsibility?= Message-ID: *Call for contributions to (virtual) PDC workshop: ?Computing Professionals for Social Responsibility: The Past, Present and Future Values of Participatory Design?* Values play a central role in technology design. But whose values? Where are they coming from? How exactly do they play out and shape the socio-technical systems we create? And which values do we want to prevail? New challenges such as the climate crisis and societal polarization call for technologists to become part of the public and political arena. This results in a new sense of responsibility, but the closing of CPSR , the Computing Professionals for Social Responsibility, has left a gap. Today, across tech workers, academics and computing professionals, there is a renewed sense of urgency for engaging the public and politics to change course in how computing is shaping society. At a time when intersections in automation and AI agendas, social justice and climate emergency are inspiring researchers of all types and temperaments to write passionate appeals for change , is it time to revive the activist wing of PD with a new structure for public and political engagement? This interactive workshop at PDC 2020 (conducted remotely) will re-invigorate the debate around values and social responsibility across disciplinary boundaries in the Latin American context to discuss: *Who has what responsibilities related to values in computing today?* Where are the boundaries, connections and overlaps in value responsibilities across designers, academic researchers, tech workers, community organizers and other stakeholders? Whose values are marginalized how? What can we learn from CPSR? *How do we handle values critically in PD research and practice?* Beyond a call to be sensitive, and methods to support sensitivity, PD must also face how marginalization, coercion and false consensus play out on the level of values. How do existing approaches to PD account for this? Does this present a challenge to PD practice and research? How can computing professionals and academics support those affected by computing in emancipating themselves from the values embedded in computing? *What should a CPSR for the 21st century look like?* The CPSR wound down over a decade ago, but today, organizations like it are more needed than ever. What could such an organization achieve? What should it be like? How could it come to be? Many organizations, initiatives, collectives and individuals already speak to these concerns. How can they connect and cooperate more effectively? We ask prospective participants to submit a short position paper (500-1000 words) in English, Spanish or Portuguese that outlines - a concrete case or experience report that speaks to responsibilities and values, - a historical view on CPSR, - a reflection or critique of current positions or practices, or - a personal interest statement. Please submit papers via email to pdc2020cpsr at gmail.com by April 7. We are also building a collaborative map of relevant organizations and welcome contributions! *A note on Covid-19:* We expect that the workshop will be primarily or exclusively conducted remotely. PDC currently operates on the assumption that the conference will take place, but that remote participation will be essential and supported. Organizers: - Christoph Becker, University of Toronto, Canada - Ann Light, University of Sussex, UK - Victoria Palacin, University of Helsinki and LUT University, Finland - Dawn Walker, University of Toronto, Canada - Christopher Frauenberger, TU Wien, Austria - Rachel Charlotte Smith, Aarhus University, Denmark - Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, University of Toronto, Canada - Pedro Reynolds-Cu?llar, MIT Media Lab, USA - David Nemer, University of Virginia, USA Workshop website: https://pdc2020cpsr.wordpress.com/ -- Douglas Schuler douglas at publicsphereproject.org Twitter: @doug_schuler ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Public Sphere Project http://www.publicsphereproject.org/ Mailing list ~ Collective Intelligence for the Common Good * http://lists.scn.org/mailman/listinfo/ci 4cg-announce* Creating the World Citizen Parliament http://interactions.acm.org/archive/view/may-june-2013/creating-the-world-citizen-parliament Liberating Voices! A Pattern Language for Communication Revolution (project) http://www.publicsphereproject.org/patterns/lv Liberating Voices! A Pattern Language for Communication Revolution (book) http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=11601 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From xdxd.vs.xdxd at gmail.com Wed Mar 25 05:08:14 2020 From: xdxd.vs.xdxd at gmail.com (xDxD.vs.xDxD) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 05:08:14 +0100 Subject: La Cura VS COVID19 Message-ID: Hi everyone! (I am reposting this from another mailing list because I think that it can interest many here: sorry if I'm wrong) My cancer decided to came back now I'm fine, don't worry: I have had another surgery that went well, and I'm fully recovering but this synchronicity has been really important for those who remember, back in 2012, when I had my first cancer, i used medical data to propose a global repositioning of disease in society: https://www.artisopensource.net/projects/la-cura/ a cure can happen only in the middle of society: that was the synthesis of La Cura, the global performance into which I had transformed my cancer, inspired by visionary innovators such as Franco Basaglia What is, now, La Cura at the time of COVID19? It turns out that it's a really meaningful continuation in the same direction: a cancer and a global pandemic perfectly show the coexistence of two dimensions: the individual and the ecosystem This coexistence has a tragic aspect: the two dimensions can be at open war with each other This was perfectly clear, for example, while being in the hospital: I risked not being able to have my surgery because of the COVID19 situation. This tragic character of the situation is exactly the condition which we'll start to face in the crises that are about to start coming up systematically: climate change, migrations, poverty, health, access and the others. The tragic coexistence between the individual and the ecosytem, and the problems that come with it: which are complex and, thus, irreducible. Complexity doesn't have "solution". It has a life, a way to cope with it, but not a solution in the sense of being able to reduce it to a point. There's no App for it. In today's life we have tried all to try to remove tragedy from our lives. And, instead, this new condition shows us just how much we need this tragic dimension in our lives. As tragedy is complexity, and complexity is tragic and irreducible: it just doesn't go away. And: with/after tragedy comes Agnition: the ability to understand, recognize and transform/adapt. In our world, this tragic dimension has a lot to do with data and computation. The complex phenomena of our planet can be only experieced through enormous quantities and qualities of data, and through the computation needed to collect them, and to processes and represent them. How can I experience climate change (as a global phenomenon, not just because it is hotter in my city)? COV19? Povety? etc Data, data, data, and computation. Understanding this tragic condition, in context, means that data + computation need to be addressed as existential issues, not as technical ones. This means a necessary focus shift towards finding/building the new rituals, times, habits, practices and traditions with which we will learn to inhabit our world through data and computation. This is, for example, what we've been doing with the Datapoiesis project: https://datapoiesis.com/home/ And this is what we will continue to do now, through this tragic continuation of La Cura. We started writing two articles about it: they're in italian for now, but if there's interest and if someone who speaks native english can help me out, we'd love to translate and share. Here they are, and we designed the article series so that we arrive at a total of 10 articles: https://operavivamagazine.org/sogni-e-nuovi-rituali/ https://operavivamagazine.org/i-rituali-del-nuovo-abitare-dopo-la-tragedia/ BTW: if anyone wants to join in: i think it would form a wonderful publications in these times of "La Cura VS COVID19" Thanks everyone: be safe and happy Salvatore -- Art is Open Source - http://www.artisopensource.net Human Ecosystems Relazioni - https://www.he-r.it/ Ubiquitous Commons - http://www.ubiquitouscommons.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhopkins at neoscenes.net Fri Mar 27 16:54:40 2020 From: jhopkins at neoscenes.net (John Hopkins) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:54:40 -0600 Subject: La Cura VS COVID19 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0ebff59f-282a-ca56-1186-97a34f4c6205@neoscenes.net> Data data data -- An ever-increasing data feedback system eventually grinds to a halt, choking on the granularity and complexity of recording, saving, meta-data-ing, processing, and interpreting the feedback. Not to mention the clouds of CO2 that accompany this energy-intensive and ever-accretionary process of turning the map into the territory. There is an asymptotic limit to the madness of data. We are as close to that asymptote as we will (hopefully) ever be. We cannot afford, by any metric, to gather more data, much less 'use' it. I personally don't need more data rituals. I'd rather spend more time in analog reception of the energy flows that I am a part of, and that I am immersed within. Pondering those flows directly allows the question "What is the nature of reality?" not only to surface organically, but for it to become ever more moot, *and* ever more part of life. Whenever I hear of someone with an Apple watch telling them to breath, I think, that's stupid to off-shore our embodied self-awareness to that globe-spanning techno-social feedback network. Partly, yes, because it takes a huge amount of energy to implement such a system, and partly in that it is the exact problem driving the ongoing lack of response to human-caused climate distortion -- that is, the wholesale separation of our (symbolic) mental processes from the immediate experience of the world-that-is. jh On 24/Mar/20 22:08, xDxD.vs.xDxD wrote: > The complex phenomena of our planet can be only experieced through enormous > quantities and qualities of data, and through the computation needed to > collect them, and to processes and represent them. How can I experience > climate change (as a global phenomenon, not just because it is hotter in my > city)? COV19? Povety? etc > > Data, data, data, and computation. > > Understanding this tragic condition, in context, means that data + > computation need to be addressed as existential issues, not as technical > ones. > > This means a necessary focus shift towards finding/building the new > rituals, times, habits, practices and traditions with which we will learn > to inhabit our world through data and computation. -- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Dr. John Hopkins, BSc, MFA, PhD hanging on to the Laramide Orogeny http://tech-no-mad.net/blog/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From xdxd.vs.xdxd at gmail.com Fri Mar 27 18:17:25 2020 From: xdxd.vs.xdxd at gmail.com (xDxD.vs.xDxD) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:17:25 +0100 Subject: La Cura VS COVID19 In-Reply-To: <0ebff59f-282a-ca56-1186-97a34f4c6205@neoscenes.net> References: <0ebff59f-282a-ca56-1186-97a34f4c6205@neoscenes.net> Message-ID: On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 4:55 PM John Hopkins wrote: > Data data data -- > > you are assuming that you can do without it, and that is not a given anyhow: you are also assuming that "data" necessarily means someone with an apple watch and that "data" necessarily means "extracion" and "consumption" we're obviously talking about two very different concepts here (sorry that I don't have the immediate time/energy to translate the articles) s -- *Art is Open Source *- http://www.artisopensource.net *Human Ecosystems Relazioni* - https://www.he-r.it/ *Ubiquitous Commons *- http://www.ubiquitouscommons.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhopkins at neoscenes.net Fri Mar 27 19:27:05 2020 From: jhopkins at neoscenes.net (John Hopkins) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 12:27:05 -0600 Subject: La Cura VS COVID19 In-Reply-To: References: <0ebff59f-282a-ca56-1186-97a34f4c6205@neoscenes.net> Message-ID: I'm sorry if I misunderstand your usage of the term. If we are talking about different things, and your definition is so extremely different, then there would be a need to define it for the people, like me, who are understanding the term in its common techno-social form. Perhaps another word or phrase needs to be invented to describe your understanding of "data"... On 27/Mar/20 11:17, xDxD.vs.xDxD wrote: > we're obviously talking about two very different concepts here -- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Dr. John Hopkins, BSc, MFA, PhD hanging on to the Laramide Orogeny http://tech-no-mad.net/blog/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From xdxd.vs.xdxd at gmail.com Fri Mar 27 20:28:20 2020 From: xdxd.vs.xdxd at gmail.com (xDxD.vs.xDxD) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 20:28:20 +0100 Subject: La Cura VS COVID19 In-Reply-To: References: <0ebff59f-282a-ca56-1186-97a34f4c6205@neoscenes.net> Message-ID: no, actually I think that data is just fine as a word. The problem here is the framing. Once we invented a new literary genre: algorithmic autobiography https://www.artisopensource.net/projects/ghostwriter/ https://www.artisopensource.net/2016/02/16/algorithmic-autobiography-the-uncertain-boundaries-of-the-i-and-the-self-in-the-age-of-hyperconnectivity/ This gesture corresponds to taking something that is in the world (even something as tecno-administrative as data) and turning it into existential: we used it through the lens of culture, of our existence and thus of our possibility to express, represent ourselves, relate etc Now: If there is one thing we have learned from covid19 it is that data and computation are a matter of life, existence and survival: of being able to exist in the world. In todays world, the one we have now, hyperconnected, globalized and constantly on the edge of an ecosystemic crisis that the planet doesn't care about at all, but that is bound to exterminate us, data is existential: it is a matter of existence, or survival. Big, enormous quantities and qualities of data. That are the only way in which we can experience the complex, global, ubiquitous issues which we're talking about. This is how we can do it: flesh, blood, piss, data and computation. The issues of privacy and control are just too small: a discussion like this cannot fit into them. We need a larger, existential frame. cheers! s On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 7:28 PM John Hopkins wrote: > I'm sorry if I misunderstand your usage of the term. If we are talking > about > different things, and your definition is so extremely different, then > there > would be a need to define it for the people, like me, who are > understanding the > term in its common techno-social form. Perhaps another word or phrase > needs to > be invented to describe your understanding of "data"... > > On 27/Mar/20 11:17, xDxD.vs.xDxD wrote: > > we're obviously talking about two very different concepts here > > > -- > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Dr. John Hopkins, BSc, MFA, PhD > hanging on to the Laramide Orogeny > http://tech-no-mad.net/blog/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > -- *Art is Open Source *- http://www.artisopensource.net *Human Ecosystems Relazioni* - https://www.he-r.it/ *Ubiquitous Commons *- http://www.ubiquitouscommons.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: