[Art_of_Criticism] EU COST Action Network | Art of Criticism

[Miriam Rasch]

Dear Pablo,

I was meaning to write to you one of these days about the proposal. Actually, I believe that non-European countries are also able to join the network, so it would be great to have you on board! Let us check once more how it works, then Leonieke will probably email you the details of how to proceed.

Best,
Miriam



---
Miriam Rasch
Institute of Network Cultures
Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences | HvA
room 04A07
Rhijnspoorplein 1
NL-1091 GC Amsterdam
t: +31 20 5951865
miriam at networkcultures.org
www.networkcultures.org
@INCAmsterdam

> On 15 Mar 2018, at 21:51, Pa Gobira <pa.gobira at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Leonieke;
> 
> I am a professor from Brazil, and as I said to Miriam Rasch this initiative is amazing and I agree with the proposal. I am sure that it is going to be well succeed. But I am working in Brazil right now so I think you all are thinking in this first moment to go through inside Europe. If not, and if you permit my participation, you can account with me!
> 
> Best regards;
> 
> 
> --
> PABLO GOBIRA, B.el, Me., Dr.
> Full-time professor doctor (State University of Minas Gerais/UEMG)
> Director of Lab|Front - Laboratory of Front Poetics (CNPq/UEMG)
> Docent at Arts Graduate Program (UEMG)
> Mailing Address: Rua Ascânio Burlamarque, 540 - Mangabeiras - Belo Horizonte - MG
> CEP: 30315-030 - Telefones na Escola Guignard: +55 (31) 3194-9300 - Fax: +55 (31) 3194-9303
> [Research group] http://labfront.weebly.com/
> [Conference of art & technology] http://www.artesdigitais.art.br/
> [Graduate Program] http://ppgartes.uemg.br/
> [Blog] http://extensao.uemg.br/culturaearte/
> 
> 2018-03-15 9:09 GMT-03:00 Leonieke van Dipten <leonieke at networkcultures.org>:
> Dear all,
> 
> After our meet-up in November we’ve been busy with funding opportunities for the network. With a small group we’ve been looking into / working on a COST Action grant. 
> 
> COST is a EU-fuding programme to set-up and strengthen research networks. The grant would enable us to organise meetings, conferences, training schools, research exchanges and other network activities. COST is an open network, meaning everyone can join, both academic and non-academic. Becoming a COST members is easy as there are no financial or other commitments that have to be made. 
>  
> Please read our proposal below and let us know if you are interested to participate in this application. 
> 
> Best,
> Leonieke
> 
> ——— 
> Technologies for an Art of Criticism: Tending Resilient and Inclusive Societies
> TACTRIS
> 
>  
> Preliminary proposal for a COST-action network, by the Institute of Network Cultures
> 
> A growing international network of researchers, practitioners and organisers within the field of art and cultural criticism is forming. The aim of this COST-application is to further develop and strengthen this network across Europe and to help establish a multiplicity of critical cultures in Europe. During four years the network will exchange best practices and experiences, develop theoretical knowledge, make interventions in the field, and produce publications, workshops and conferences. The proposal is coordinated by the Institute of Network Cultures and is open to all interested parties, both academic and non-academic. Participation is in the proposal is easy: there are no financial or other commitments that have to be made. If the grant is received, the programme will start in 2019. For more information on how to become a member of the network, contact Leonieke van Dipten on leonieke at networkcultures.org; if you want more information on the mission of the network and the aim of the proposal, contact Miriam Rasch on miriam at networkcultures.org. 
> 
>  
> About the aim of the proposal
> 
> Technological, economical and aesthetic developments in the fourth industrial revolution have put considerable strain on public critical reflection, and art criticism specifically. The accelerated nature of the internet, the decimation of revenues online, the severe budget cuts in the cultural domain, and shifting political perceptions of the role of arts and culture have put the field in a tough spot. 
> 
>             Why is that a problem? Critically assessing artistic and cultural productions in an open and inclusive media sphere is a prerequisite for a reflective society. Europe especially has a long history, at least since the Enlightenment and running up to this day, of appreciating reflection on art and cultural productions in this way. It offers a platform to formulate both ethically and aesthetically what it means to be human (together) in a given time and place; to critically evaluate the desirability of the status quo; and to envision possible (other) futures. In this way, art criticism is connected to the establishment of a critical culture, which can be seen as essential to a strong democratic culture. Unfortunately, parallel to a decline in appreciation of democratic values across Europe, this cultural heritage of a reflective tradition is in risk of diminishment. The need for such critical cultures, which should be open and inclusive to multiple groups in society, and which is called for both on the local and on the inter-local or international level, is obvious and at the heart of the European Challenge for ‘Inclusive, innovative and reflective societies’. 
> 
>             Digital technology, which may have caused a large part of the uproar, can also play a significant role in stimulating and renewing critical cultures. Technological advances present opportunities to open up to new audiences and to directly involve target groups, and as such to cater to more inclusive and diverse critical cultures. Next to that, digital technology offers innovative possibilities to generate revenue. However, possible affordances are not to be taken for granted. Existing tools and media are often US-based, closed-in and not very transparent (like Facebook, Google and Amazon). Their influence on the European field of art and culture criticism cannot be overstated, but it is not immediately obvious how such platforms can be used to the benefit of the specific field of criticality, arts and culture.  
> 
>             It is therefore necessary to actively pursue, investigate and stimulate ways in which strong critical cultures can profit from digital technology. To this aim, TACTRIS brings together researchers, practitioners and institutions. Ultimately, this will contribute to the European Challenge ‘Inclusive, innovative and reflective societies’ and to a stronger democratic Europe in general. How these affordances can help reinvigorate and strengthen critical practices within a broad societal context is worked out in more detail in the four Working Groups below.
> 
>  
> 
> WG1-INCLUSIVITY. Advocating inclusiveness of minorities and underrepresented groups in the critical debate
> 
> How can technology be used to stimulate a critical culture with different voices, in terms of gender, age and ethnic background? How to make the role of the public more prominent, using a bottom-up approach? Collaboration with different audiences calls for a local focus, which then feeds exchanges on a broader regional, national or international level. New audiences also call for new editorial processes (WG4) and are a possible entry gate to new revenue models (WG2). Interventions in the local critical debate (and in the local language) are exchanged on an inter-local level.
> 
>  
> 
> WG2-REVENUES. Innovations in revenue models and finances catered to small and/or independent businesses in the arts and cultural publishing sector
> 
> The financial organization of critical practices has come under a lot of pressure in the past decade. State funding has been cut across Europe, while in many countries (for example experiencing political tensions), using state money can mean a compromise to begin with. The free market raises its own issues, for example in the shift of the advertising landscape to Facebook and Google. How can a viable critical culture remain transparent and ethical? What innovations are there beyond models reliant on donation, crowdfunding, and online subscription, and that take into account the wish and need to reach different audiences (WG1)? How can the critical field reduce its dependence on existing media monopolies, or use them to a more sustainable benefit, applying and bending the possibilities of data mining and other ‘post-digital’ practices (WG3)?
> 
>  
> WG3-POSTINTERNET. Post-digital aesthetics and work modes in the context of the fourth industrial revolution
> 
> An inclusive and technologically minded art criticism should have attention for inclusive and technologically minded arts (WG1). What do contemporary art practices demand from critical assessments, when it comes to concepts, formats, methods (WG4)? How do post-internet art and post-digital aesthetics - in which the offline and the online have become indistinguishable and the roles between artist, curator, public and critic have blurred - interrelate with the technological developments of the fourth industrial revolution? Data manipulation, automation and fragmentation take on their specific shape in the critical domain, where they have the appearance of for example fake reviews or bots polluting the public debate, deserving attention from both a technical and from an aesthetic perspective. 
> 
>  
> WG4-EDITORIAL. Designing editorial processes for a new generation
> 
> A sustainable critical domain needs to organise itself so that it can cater to the call of inclusivity (WG1) and making revenue (WG2), while at the same time functioning as a breeding ground for the next generation of (professional) critics and cultural and artistic forms (WG3). This calls for editorial processes that work in open, lean, flexible and technologically minded ways. What kind of digital tools are needed to shape a critical culture that is inclusive and resilient? Existing forms and strategies and promising concepts for a ‘fourth industrial revolution criticism’ will be evaluated and new formats and methodologies will be developed into concrete, easy to use products for researchers, editors and critics. Thus, this WG will have a high impact measure.
> 
> 
> ---
> Leonieke van Dipten
> Institute of Network Cultures
> Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences | HvA
> room 04A09
> Rhijnspoorplein 1
> NL-1091 GC Amsterdam
> t: +31 6 11 84 84 00
> Leonieke at networkcultures.org
> www.networkcultures.org
> @INCAmsterdam
> 
> Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date on publications and events
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Artofcriticism mailing list
> Artofcriticism at listcultures.org
> http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/artofcriticism_listcultures.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Artofcriticism mailing list
> Artofcriticism at listcultures.org
> http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/artofcriticism_listcultures.org